-Te-c(RA-D/L)

"Trial" ApplicationLogic(Convergent/Creative)

Trial
""Sparking insight from small stimuli, cutting steps to get things moving" — Improvising Tech Hacker"
Small-scale experiments, prototype tools, agile improvement, applied hacks, procedure memos, testing notes
Traits of Trial
비합리
非合理
동적
動的
진지
深刻
완고
頑固
프로세스
プロセス
부정주의
否定主義
민주주의
民主主義
Receptive-adaptive
수용-적응
Irrationality is a perceptual style that focuses on sensory impressions, intuitive flas
• Tends to act spontaneously, observing the situation as it unfolds
• Generally flexible and tolerant
• May frequently change decisions
• Takes on many things at once but may lose interest and abandon them midway
• Movements appear smooth and fluid
• Leadership style tends to be democratic (bottom-up)
• Relatively high stress tolerance
Dynamic types tend to perceive the world as a continuous flow of change, focusing on tr
• Tends to perceive the world as a continuous process of change and flux
• Focuses on transitions, progressions, and directional trends
• Remembers events as narratives or flowing sequences
• Sensitive to processes and fluidity that unfold over time
• Focuses on "how things have changed" (past → future) rather than states themselves

Characteristic Behaviors and Cognition
• Recalls memories as "moving images" or video-like sequences
• Sensitive to changes in people and situations, adjusting beh
Serious types believe in objective, absolute standards of correctness and approach rela
Emotions and Relationships
• Has difficulty reading emotional atmospheres and subtle moods
• Does not separate fun from activity — experiences enjoyment as embedded within the activity itself
• Encounters must go through a step-by-step, formal process (e.g., introductions, greetings)
• Values information like names and titles; does not consider someone an "acquaintance" without a proper introduction

Worldview and Judgment Style
• Believes that correctness is determined by objective, absolute s
Obstinate types treat their interests and passions as sacred and non-negotiable, while
Core Values
• Interests (goals, passions) are sacred and inviolable
• Resources (possessions, abilities) are flexible tools to be utilized

Behavioral and Psychological Characteristics
• When interested in something, refuses to give up even when resources are lacking: "If I don't have enough, I'll keep working until I do"
• Holds strong attachment and sense of identity toward personal interests, preferences, and principles
• Relatively unbothered when others use their possessions or time, but r
Process types approach tasks sequentially and step by step, immersing themselves in the
Key Characteristics
• Approaches things sequentially and in stages
• Finds it difficult to stop once they have committed to something
• Easily becomes immersed in a process, entering fully into the situation
• A "single-tasker" who focuses on one thing at a time
• Tends to read books and information from beginning to end in order

Speech Tendencies and Vocabulary
• Prefers words like "flow," "process," "step by step," and "in progress"
• Often says things like "I'm still in the middle of it" or
Negativist types perceive the world in terms of what is missing or lacking, naturally i
Cognitive and Expressive Tendencies
• Perceives things in terms of "what is missing" and "what is lacking"
• Tends to identify problems and deficiencies, driven to resolve them
• Initially keeps some distance with new acquaintances, making cautious assessments
• Uses negative expressions more than positive ones ("it's not...," "I wouldn't...")
• When presenting an issue, leads with the negative perspective: "this is good, but this is missing"

Examples (Negative Framing)
• "This glass is half e
Democratic types perceive others based on their individual, unique characteristics. Rel
• Sees others as individuals rather than categorizing them as "a certain type of person"
• Judges people through personal, direct impressions such as "approachable," "intelligent," or "interesting"
• Relationships are based on one-on-one compatibility and shared values rather than group affiliation
• Values "being who I am" — individualistic by nature
• Shows little interest in questions like "where is this person from?"
• Rarely uses expressions like "I represent such-and-such group"
수용적이고 적응적인 기질. 외부 환경에 순응하며, 안정적이고 조화로운 상태를 추구합니다.
Parent Functions
Types with this as a basic function

Characteristics of People Strong in This Function

Positive Traits (Healthy Range)

[Micro-Experiment Meister]
- Resolving small on-site bottlenecks
- Ten-minute scripts
- Improvised jigs
- Instant solutions
- Nimble improvements

[Procedure Note Artisan]
- Turning trial logs into short procedure manuals
- Incrementally building information
- Preventing subsequent failures
- Accumulated records
- Knowledge stockpile

[Improvisational Tech Hacker]
- Inspiration from small stimuli
- Trimming procedures to get things running
- Quick experiments
- Simple procedures
- A catalytic presence

[Information Accumulator]
- Records of "I just tried it"
- Accelerating subsequent improvement cycles
- Knowledge accumulation
- Process improvement
- Continuous contribution

[Emergency Inventor]
- Instantly improving minor inconveniences
- Raising the team's work efficiency
- Improving tools and workspaces
- Practical ingenuity
- Immediate effectiveness

Neutral Traits

[Experimental]
- Always trying things out
- "Let's try it"
- Small-scale experiments
- But what about quality?
- Left unfinished?

[Improvisational]
- Improvising on the spot
- Instant prototyping
- "If it works, it's fine"
- But what about planning?
- Systematization?

[Simplification-Oriented]
- Trimming the unnecessary
- Minimal procedures
- Streamlining
- But going too far?
- Even necessary things?

[Record-Loving]
- Procedure notes
- Trial logs
- "Let's keep a record"
- But organizing?
- Systematization?

Negative Traits (Pathological Range)

[Mild]
- Neglecting quality
- Excessive experimentation
- "Left unfinished"
- Lack of systematization
- Ignoring safety

[Moderate]
- Dangerous experiments
- Quality problems
- Loss of trust
- "Failed again"
- Doesn't scale

[Severe]
- Serious accidents
- Complete chaos
- Breakdown of relationships
- Legal issues
- Social sanctions

[Secondary Problems]
- Injuries / Accidents
- Legal liability
- Financial losses
- Isolation
- Loss of trust

Differences by Developmental Stage

[Childhood (Ages 0-12)]
Characteristics:
- Loves crafting
- Experimental
- "Let me try this"
- A resourceful child
- Applied thinking

Challenges:
- Dangerous experiments
- Breaking things
- "Broke it again"
- Neglecting quality

How to raise:
- Acknowledge their ingenuity
- But also teach safety
- Moderate experimentation
- Find balance

[Adolescence (Ages 13-25)]
Characteristics:
- DIY / Crafts
- Small-scale experiments
- Prototyping
- Applied thinking
- Talent for improvisation

Challenges:
- Neglecting quality
- Ignoring safety
- Lack of systematization
- Balance

Developmental tasks:
- Developing quality awareness
- Understanding safety
- Learning systematization
- But preserving ingenuity

[Adulthood (Ages 26-40)]
Characteristics:
- Internal tool developer
- Rapid prototype engineer
- Lab notebook editor
- DIY workshop leader
- Improvisation specialist

Challenges:
- Quality management
- Safety management
- Scalability
- Balance

Signs of maturity:
- Balance with quality
- Establishing safety
- Also learning systematization
- Sustainable experimentation

[Middle Age (Ages 41-60)]
Characteristics:
- Master of ingenuity
- Rich in experience
- Mentoring younger people
- Improvisational technique
- Influence

Strengths:
- Deep experience
- Precise improvisation
- Sense of balance
- Also understands quality

Challenges:
- Maintaining flexibility
- Adapting to new technologies
- Health management

[Old Age (Ages 61+)]
Characteristics:
- Embodiment of ingenuity
- Wisdom of application
- Advice for younger generations
- "Ingenuity matters"
- Gentle experimentation

Strengths:
- Years of experience
- Wisdom of improvisation
- Influence on younger people
- Practical advice