【Conscience Detection -> Common Sense Evaluation Linked Circuit】
-Fi-p (Receptor: how the world is perceived)
Rapid activation of the medial prefrontal cortex
↓
Detects moral discomfort from weak stimuli
↓
"Is this ethically correct?"
↓
Sensing the voice of conscience
↓
Sensitive reaction to unfairness and injustice
↓
Internal detection of moral issues
【Integration Process: Correlator】
Thinking, contemplation, planning, metacognition
↓
Leading-Creative coordination
↓
Corrects the flow with a piercing, pinpointed question
↓
Linkage of conscience <-> ethical common sense
+Se-c (Effector: means of realization)
Activation of the posterior cingulate cortex - insular cortex
↓
Grasping social reality
↓
Cross-referencing with ethical common sense
↓
"How does this stand by social norms?"
↓
Evaluation by general moral standards
↓
Judgment of "according to society's ethical view"
【Judge-Type Judgment Circuit】
Detection by conscience
↓
-Fi-p internally senses moral issues
↓
"This is unfair" "Someone will be hurt"
↓
Evaluation by social common sense
↓
+Se-c cross-references with ethical common sense
↓
"Is this judgment justified by social norms?"
↓
"How does it measure up to general morality?"
↓
Presentation of a fair judgment
↓
Ensuring moral validity
【Dopamine (Low-Medium Level, Burst Type)】
-Fi-p component: When detecting moral issues
+Se-c component: When confirming ethical validity
Integration (Fi-Se-Qi): Neural basis of the Information Generator
Converts moral discomfort + social validity into data
【Noradrenaline (Medium Level, Selective)】
-Fi-p component: Vigilance against unfairness
+Se-c component: Detecting inconsistencies with ethical common sense
Integration: Maintenance of moral monitoring
【Serotonin (Medium Level, Fluctuating Type)】
Before moral issue detection: Medium
During evaluation: Low (tension)
After fair judgment: High (sense of accomplishment)
【Oxytocin (Low-Medium Level, Selective)】
Ethical consideration
Empathy for "who will be hurt"
Pursuit of fairness
【Glutamate (Medium Activity)】
Promotion of synaptic plasticity
Strengthening the linkage of conscience detection -> common sense evaluation
The more experience accumulated, the easier the Leading-Creative coordination becomes
【Integrated Excitation Conditions】
-Fi-p (Receptor) activation:
Unfairness, injustice, moral issues
"Someone will lose out" "Someone will be hurt"
Ethical discomfort, pangs of conscience
"This is not right"
+Se-c (Effector) activation:
Situations requiring cross-referencing with social reality
Application of ethical common sense
Judgment of "how does this stand by social norms"
General moral standards
Integration Pattern (Fi-Se-Qi):
Conscience detection -> evaluation by ethical common sense -> fair judgment
Holographic Panorama, correcting the flow with a piercing, pinpointed question
【Integrated Inhibition Conditions】
-Fi-p component: Strong stimuli (emotional excess)
+Se-c component: Situations where social norms are unclear
Integration Mechanism:
Balance between conscience and common sense
Rhythm of "detection -> evaluation -> judgment"
Ensuring fairness through result orientation
【Development of Linkage】
Early: Using -Fi-p and +Se-c sequentially, "first feel with conscience, then evaluate"
Middle: Coordination becomes easier, "feeling while evaluating" becomes possible
Late: Gradually blending, formation of the Holographic Panorama
Mature: Ultimately becomes a single process, conscience detection immediately accompanied by ethical common sense
【Consumption Pattern】
-Fi-p component: Medium (90-110 kcal/hour), intermittent
+Se-c component: Low-Medium (70-90 kcal/hour), intermittent
Integration (Fi-Se-Qi): Medium (80-100 kcal/hour), sustained
【Duration】
Receptor (-Fi-p): Seconds to minutes of conscience detection (frequent)
Effector (+Se-c): Minutes to hours of social evaluation
Correlator (Fi-Se-Qi): Until fair judgment is reached, continuous monitoring
【Fatigue and Recovery】
Fatigue: Exhaustion from continuous moral monitoring
Recovery: Achievement of fair judgment, confirmation of ethical validity, realization of "the right outcome"
Characteristic: Information Generator, converts moral discomfort + social validity into data and feeds them into the improvement loop
【Holographic Panorama Cognition】
Bird's-eye view of the whole, grasping moral issues
Overall perspective of "who bears the disadvantage"
"Who is being left behind"
Reverse-calculating from results, exposing ethical oversights
【Result-Oriented, Fairness-Oriented】
Detection of moral issues
Evaluation by ethical common sense
Fair judgment, correct outcomes
Ensuring social validity
【Individualistic Adjudicator】
Internal judgment based on conscience
"Is this ethically correct?"
Piercing, pinpointed question
Pursuing through social common sense
【Elements Valued】
The voice of conscience, moral validity
Ethical common sense, social fairness
General morality, society's ethical view
"Will no one be hurt?"
【Elements Undervalued】
Pursuit of efficiency alone
Superficial harmony, formalistic procedures
Personal gain, expediency
【Decision-Making Process】
Detection by conscience -> cross-referencing with ethical common sense -> fair judgment
Burst decisions in seconds to minutes
"Is this judgment ethically correct?"
"Is it valid by social norms?"
【Integrated Process】
Conscience detection: Moral discomfort, sensing unfairness
Ethical common sense cross-referencing: Confirming validity by social norms
Pinpointed question: "Is this judgment fair?" "Who stands to lose?"
Fair evaluation: Judgment based on ethical common sense
Moral conclusion: Presenting the correct outcome
【Characteristics】
Points out hidden unfairness in project meetings and proposes reassignment
Conducts moral evaluation in product reviews asking "Is this ethically correct?"
Points out moral issues during crises while evaluating by social validity
【Integrated Attention Allocation】
Receptor (-Fi-p): Conscience (highest sensitivity), unfairness, moral issues
Effector (+Se-c): Ethical common sense (highest sensitivity), social validity
Correlator (Fi-Se-Qi): Tracking "conscience and common sense" simultaneously
Attention Priority:
Conscience detection (50%), Ethical common sense cross-referencing (40%), Fair judgment (10%)
【Easily Overlooked】
Efficiency, practicality, personal gain, short-term results
【Daily Life】
When sensing unfairness, asks "Is this judgment fair?"
Sensitive to moral issues, "Who stands to lose?"
Confirms ethical validity against social norms
Evaluates with "by general morality"
【Research and Work】
Ethics x Reality Checker: Points out hidden unfairness in project meetings and proposes reassignment
Moral Adjudicator: Conducts moral evaluation in product reviews asking "Is this ethically correct?"
Fairness Auditor: Confirms the fairness of decisions by social common sense
【Learning Style】
Prefers: Ethical understanding, fair evaluation, social validity
Dislikes: Unfair treatment, ignoring moral issues, formalism
【Way of Speaking】
Content: "Is this judgment fair?" "Who stands to lose?" "Is it valid by social norms?"
Style: Judge-like, ethical, "by general morality"
Characteristics: Heavy question, pointing out moral gaps, evaluation by ethical common sense
【Way of Listening】
High sensitivity to conscience, detection of moral issues
"That is unfair" "Someone will be hurt"
【Discussion Style】
Role: Adjudicator, Ethics x Reality Checker, Proofreader
Effect: Makes things fairer, more ethical, or tends to be strict, with a tendency toward polarization
【Healthy Range】
Stronger conscience detection, acceleration of ethical common sense evaluation, deepening of fair judgment
【Moderate Stress】
Excessive moral pointing out, "judging everything"
Obsession with perfect fairness, "until complete ethics"
【High Stress (Inferior Ne Runaway)】
Complete loss of possibilities, collapse of flexibility, isolation
【Signs of Recovery】
Achievement of fair judgment, confirmation of ethical validity, realization of "the right outcome"
【Waking Pattern】
Moral vigilance, "What about today's fairness?" "Any ethical issues?"
【Daytime Pattern】
Continuous conscience detection, evaluation by ethical common sense, fair judgment
【Evening Pattern】
Reviewing today's moral judgments, confirming "Was it fair?"
【Days Off】
Ethical study, research on a fair society, confirming moral values
