Skip to content

MODEL K · 31 TRAITS

How this differs from Reinin traits

There are different ways of looking at the same event. What should we receive, what should we base our thinking on, and how should we act? We will decipher the differences from two paired perspectives.

OVERVIEW

Five basic factors, 32 types and 31 traits.

Model K 31 Traits uses five factors—R, E, Q, N and T—to describe differences in how information is handled and processed. Some names are familiar, but their definitions and type assignments belong to Model K.

15 / 31

The two frameworks at a glance.

Reinin traitsModel K 31 Traits
Basic factors4 factors5 factors
Number of types16 2⁴32 2⁵
Number of traits15 2⁴ − 131 2⁵ − 1
The role of QAsking / Declaring as a derived traitOpening / retaining an evaluation as an independent factor

Reinin traits describe 15 binary divisions of 16 types. Model K uses five factors to describe 32 types and the 31 non-empty products of those factors.

On 16 types and 15 dichotomies: A. Augustinavičiūtė & G. Reinin · 2006

STRUCTURE

Why there are 31 traits

Four factors give 15 non-empty combinations; five give 31. This does not mean that the old 15 traits remain unchanged with 16 simply added. Model K changes the role of Q and specifies the meaning of each trait, so a familiar name does not guarantee the same definition or type assignment.

The basic factors in Model K

Questim / Declatim is not just a way of speaking.

In Model K, Q describes whether an established evaluation is reopened or retained as a basis for further processing. It is not a count of questions, an assertive speaking style or a measure of confidence. Each of the 16 basic types has a Q/D distinction, giving 32 types.

TERMS

From earlier labels to the current definitions.

This table connects earlier labels on this site with current Model K terms. It is not a synonym table for replacing every classical Reinin description. Each linked trait page gives the current definition.

Earlier label on this siteCurrent traitFocus of the definition
Positivist / NegativistSufficiency/DeficiencySee establishment point / See deficiencies
Constructivist / EmotivistConstruction/Emergenceelement relationship / whole state
Process / ResultContinuity/Segmentationcontinuous development / delimited units
Carefree / FarsightedImprovisation/PreparationProcessing when necessary / Pre-processing
Yielding / ObstinateSavoring/PursuitResource-Anchored / Interest-Anchored
Democratic / AristocraticIndividuality/AffiliationIntrinsic Reference / Positional Reference
Judicious / DecisiveNaturalness/ReadinessContinuous Transition / State Switching
Merry / SeriousContextual/UniversalContext-Bound / Context-Independent
DISTINCTIONS

Separate meanings that were previously read together.

What information is taken to be, how it is processed and where action begins are different questions. Rather than loading several meanings into one trait, use the distinction that describes the process in question.

Descriptions that combine rationality with flexibility or consistency

Irrationality/Rationality

Whether processing starts from a state or a judgment.

Flexibility/Consistency

Whether new information changes the framework or is incorporated while retaining a core.

Descriptions that combine extraversion with being prompted from outside

Extraversion/Introversion

Whether the reference point is the object or an internal representation.

Inspiration/Initiation

Whether unfolding begins through external contact or from an internal core.

Descriptions that combine Questim / Declatim with caution about the unknown

Questim/Declatim

Whether an evaluation is reopened or retained.

Suspension/Supposition

Whether unknown information is left unresolved or filled in with possible states.

More examples

Descriptions that combine intuition with spreading or concentrating information

Intuition/Sensing

Whether information is latent or manifest.

Concentration/Unfolding

Whether information is integrated locally or connected into a sequence.

Descriptions that combine logic with explaining causes or identifying objects

Logic/Ethics

Whether judgment is based on structure or on value.

Inquiry/Identification

Whether a process and its causes are explained or an object is identified.

Descriptions that combine Dynamic with adapting flexibly

Static/Dynamic

Whether something is represented as properties and states or as transitions.

Flexibility/Consistency

Whether a framework is updated or a core is retained.

Descriptions that combine noticing a lack with supposing an unknown risk

Sufficiency/Deficiency

Whether the reference point is what is established or what is missing.

Suspension/Supposition

Whether unknown information remains open or is filled in with a possible state.

Descriptions that combine Strategic with preparing in advance

Tactical/Strategic

Whether the path is worked forward from the present or backward from an endpoint.

Improvisation/Preparation

Whether processing happens when needed or in advance.

FUNCTIONS & TRAITS

Function positions and traits are different concepts.

The first through eighth function positions in Model A, and properties such as strength or valuation, are not renamed as individual members of the 31 traits. For example, flexibility in using a creative function and Flexibility / Consistency as a personal trait describe different things.

READING YOUR PROFILE

What the dashboard values mean

The values aggregate the weights of fit to 32 types, obtained from assessment answers, onto the two sides of each trait. The two sides sum to 100. They are neither 31 separately measured scores nor ratings of ability or worth.

The mathematics of classification and psychological meaning are separate questions. Defining 31 product traits does not by itself establish that each psychological trait has been empirically validated.

Explore the 31 traits →